Best in 7 days
Pay in installments of $156.25 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 14 - Jun 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Why Aren't We On The Telephone GPO EllisOriginal vintage General Post Office GPO poster "A Miserable Reflection: Why Aren't We On The Telephone?" featuring a great illustration by the notable British graphic artist, printmaker and art teacher Clifford Ellis (1907 1985) and his wife Rosemary Ellis (1910 1998) depicting an upside down reflection of telegraph poles and tree branches against a stylised background with the lettering above and the GPO crown logo below. Horizontal. Very good
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
Discover Niche Categories That Outsell
Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 1314 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Good shirt, not great, but it was never trying to be
Color: Navy Blue, Size: Medium
Let’s start with the fabric. The 50/50 cotton-polyester blend sounds like a compromise, and I suppose it is — but it’s a good one. You get enough cotton to feel like an actual shirt and enough polyester to keep things from turning into a sweat tent in the heat. It holds its shape after washing. No complaints.
The collar is a genuine highlight. The pin tips keep the points flat and symmetrical, which is a small thing until you’ve owned a shirt where the collar curls after two washes. You’ll notice it. There’s also a hidden plaid print under the collar — a subtle detail that’s only visible when unbuttoned. Unnecessary, but charming.
Fit is true to size. Order what you normally order.
It’s versatile enough to tuck in for the office or wear loose on the weekend. Not going to replace your best Oxford. But at this price, it was never trying to.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect size..fitting..casual
Color: Black, Size: Medium
Perfect size...exect size ...nice quality I'm so much happy and shirt is good quality .
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 23, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Easy to order, fast delivery, great quality for the price.
Color: White, Size: Large
My husband had been looking for a white dress shirt, in oxford material off and on for two years. Most dress shirts are so big on the sides because we usually have to fit about a 17 1/2" neck. Started looking at Amazon's clothing section. Saw the COOFANDY Men's Long Sleeve Regular Fit Button Down Oxford Shirt, and ordered by Large instead of sleeve length, neck size, etc. I ordered as a surprise hoping it would work. When the COOFANDY shirt arrived, I had him try it on. Perfect fit, nice oxford material. Washed and ironed before he wore it to church. He loved it! I have now ordered three more COOFANDY men's long sleeve shirts. Hubby now wants me to see if they have short sleeve shirts! Great buy at $25.00.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Can beat the price, but a little tight
Color: Grey Blue, Size: 4X-Large
I usually order 3x shirts,but sometimes 4x on dress shirts.This shirt is 4x and still a little tight.One would be wise to order a size higher.Looks nice.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 23, 2026
★★★★★ 5
better than I expected
Color: Khaki, Size: Large
Arrived on time. Looks more expensive than cost, fit was true to size, and packaging was neat and compact.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
